Town of Auburn
Conservation Commission
January 3, 2012
Members present: Alan Villeneuve, Jeff Porter,
Ed Fherenbach, Anne Gagnon, Stephanie Hanson
Others present: Peg Donovan
Meeting opens at 7:08pm
Approval of minutes from the December 12, 2011 meeting
Motion to approve minutes as written – A.
Villeneuve Second – A. Gagnon
All in favor, motion carries
Grants/Easements
D. Smiley noted that the Con Com had received the water supply land
protection grant from the department of environmental services for the
Mason property. However other than the e-mail she had received and
forwarded to the Conservation members she had no word from the
appraiser. She will keep after him to get the work done so the grant
can be finalized.
Audubon Earth Day Celebration – Saturday, April 14
2012
S. Hanson said she had materials left from the last time the
Conservation Commission attended the event and she would help prepare
for them to attend again, however she herself probably would not be able
to be there.
P. Donavan mentioned she would be interested in being
there and helping out
Old/New Business
2012-S-2823-L title: relative to property held for water supply or flood
control
Sponsors:(Prime)Tom De Blois , Lou D'Allesandro, James Forsythe, John
Gallus, Fenton Groen, Gary Lambert, Andy Sanborn, Raymond White, William
Infantine, Mark Warden, John Reagan
J. Porter brought up the topic of the proposed bill
which looks to make the land owned by municipalities’ tax exempt. This
bill would give the roughly 4,000 acres of land in Auburn owned by the
Manchester Water Works a current use classification. This would greatly
reduce the amount of tax dollars the town currently collects from this
property. The Water Works has fought this battle with the town before
and lost, so now they are attempting to change the law.
There was discussion about how the citizens and
members of the Conservation Commission could participate or help with
the situation. A. Villeneuve said he would put an article in the Crier
about the issue.
Dusty’s Transport
J. Porter mentioned the meeting with the zoning board
concerning this issue has been postponed until the end of January. He
plans on attending. J. Porter noted that he felt the area was not
grandfathered as the lots have been altered over time. E. Fherenbach
mentioned he did not think there was any specific wording of a
grandfathered use in the zoning regulations. J. Porter noted that the
land owner feels she is grandfathered, however the zoning board does not
agree. In addition, J. Porter was able to present a photograph at the
last zoning meeting showing that the land owner has altered the use of
the area. The picture showed a nice buffer around the wet land which
contradicted the time period during which the land owner claimed to have
been mowing/clearing the area (thus negating the grandfather claim).
The was a general discussion about this issue and
what the appropriate outcome for resolution should be
Motion to adjourn – A. Villeneuve Second
- A. Gagnon
Meeting closes at 7:46pm